Suspension for one (1) year; Imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DAB decision.   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made [...]

Imposition of a fine of RM1,000.00; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC.   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order of the [...]

Charge 1 Suspension for one (1) year; An imposition of fine of RM5,000.00; To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Program conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC. Charge 2 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00 Charge 3 Suspension for six (6) months to run concurrently with one (1) year suspension; An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00   The DAB [...]

Imposition of fine of RM5,000.00; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Act and Rule 28 of the Disciplinary Rules, had made an order to vary the decision of DC, wherein to confirm part of the DC’s decision and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order of the DAB took effect on 17 June 2023.

Suspension of three (3) months; An imposition of fine of RM5,000.00; To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Act and Rule 28 of the Disciplinary Rules, had made an order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order of the DAB took effect on 17 June 2023.

An imposition of a fine of RM3,000.00; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order of the [...]

Suspension for one (1) year; An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Program conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made [...]

Suspension for eighteen (18) months; An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Program conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made [...]

Suspension for six (6) months; An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made [...]

Imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order of the DAB [...]

Suspension for one (1) year; Imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Program conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from the date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order [...]

An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and Be reprimanded.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay the costs and expenses of and incidental to the deliberation by the DAB of RM1,000.00. The order [...]

Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC. Charge 2 An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00. Charge 3 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and [...]

Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00; and To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC. Charge 2 An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00 Charge 3 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00   The DAB in the exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and [...]

(a) Suspension for one (1) year; (b) An imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; (c) Pay the Institute RM2,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and (d) To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] [...]

(a) Suspension for six (6) months; (b) Imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; (c) To pay the Institute RM2,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and (d) To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] [...]

(a) Suspension for three (3) months; (b) Imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00; (c) To pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; (d) That his Practising Certificate be cancelled for three (3) months; and (e) To attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from date of the DC decision.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of [...]

Toh Seck Hoon (3692) had on 22 October 2020 been punished by the DC and imposed a fine of RM5,000.00 and costs of RM4,000.00 for committing an unprofessional conduct wherein as the accountant and auditor of the company, she had cashed out the company’s money without directors’ approval and failed to justify her reason for doing so.  The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has made an order to confirm the decision of [...]

Hiew Kim Loong (17435) had on 10 August 2020 been imposed a fine of RM5,000.00 and costs of RM5,000.00 wherein he had failed to discharge his duty as an auditor of the Company diligently in the opinion of the directors of the company. The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has made an order to reduce the fine imposed by DC and that the member has to pay the fine of RM2,500.00, confirm [...]

Ahmad Adzli Bin Abdul Aziz (12183) had on 4 October 2021 been punished by the DC with suspension for three (3) months, imposition of a fine of RM5,000.00, cancelling of his Practising Certificate for three (3) months and to attend a course on Audit Quality Enhancement Programme conducted by the Institute within one (1) year from date of the DC decision  for committing an unprofessional conduct wherein he had failed to maintain, observe and apply the relevant professional standards as expected by every member in public practice for the purposes of assurance as to the quality of the public practice [...]

(a) Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM3,000.00; and Pay the Institute RM2,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; and (b) Charge 2 An imposition of a fine of RM2,000.00;   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC, that you have to pay the fine of RM3,000 [...]

Chua Hee Boon (13055) had on 25 August 2020 been imposed by the DC a fine of RM3,000.00 and costs of RM4,000.00 for Charge 2 for committing an unprofessional conduct wherein she had been found guilty for practising with a non-MIA member who provide public practice services to the general public. The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has made an order to confirm the decision of DC, that the member has to [...]

(a) For the record, Charge 2 against the Appellant has been dismissed by the Disciplinary Committee on 7 July 2020 based on a precedent of a matter before the DC. The DC hereby finds the Appellant guilty as charged based on the Appellant unequivocal admission to Charge 1 and Charge 3 respectively vide letter dated 22 October 2020 from the Appellant’s legal counsel and Ringkasan Hujahan Mitigasi dated 22 October 2020 attached to the letter. (b) Following the above findings, the DC imposed the following disciplinary punishments: Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000-00; and Pay the Institute [...]

(a) For the record, Charge 2 and Charge 3 against the member had been dismissed by the Disciplinary Committee on 7 July 2020 based on a precedent of a matter before the DC. The DC hereby finds the Appellant guilty as charged based on the Appellant unequivocal admission to Charge 1 and Charge 4 respectively vide letter dated 22 October 2020 from the Appellant’s legal counsel and Ringkasan Hujahan Mitigasi dated 22 October 2020 attached to the letter. (b) Following the above findings, the DC imposed the following disciplinary punishments: Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000-00; and [...]

Charge 1 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000-00; and Pay the Institute RM4,000.00 in respect of costs and expenses of and incidental to the disciplinary hearing before the DC and the investigation conducted by the IC; Charge 2 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000-00. Charge 3 An imposition of a fine of RM4,000.00.   The DAB in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] had made order to confirm the decision of DC and to pay [...]

Goh Chen Nee (16920) had on 12 October 2020 been imposed by the DC a fine of RM5,000.00 and costs of RM4,000.00 for committing an unprofessional conduct wherein she had been providing secretarial services despite not holding a valid practising certificate. The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has made an order to confirm the decision of DC, that the member has to pay the fine of RM5,000.00, costs of RM4,000.00 and to [...]

Yap Pian Seen (6621) had on 3 June 2020 been punished with suspension of one (1) year and costs of RM2,000.00 by the DC for committing an unprofessional conduct whereby the audit Firm has impaired the independence of the firm as the statutory auditor, by providing company secretarial services to certain audit clients through the firm’s staff-in-charge in other branches of the audit Firm. The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has made [...]

Azmi bin Semain (8080) had on 3 June 2020 been punished by the DC with suspension for one (1) year, costs of RM2,5000.00 and that his Practising Certificate to be cancelled for committing an unprofessional conduct wherein he had been providing both auditing and accounting services to the common clients of two separate entities controlled by AS i.e. the Firm and Azmi Consulting Sdn. Bhd. The Disciplinary Appeal Board in exercise of its powers under Section 21 of the Accountants Act 1967 [Act 94] and Rule 28 of the Malaysian Institute of Accountants (Disciplinary) Rules 2002 [P.U. (A) 229/2002] has [...]